Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:31 amSorry to say we lost all the old posts!!!! Arghhhhhh!
So we will have to start new . . .
So we will have to start new . . .
) I think that needs to be taken into account.John
Tractorsport Flowbench Forum Archive
Archived Flow Bench Forum
http://www.tractorsport.com/forum/
New Forum
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:31 amPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 11:51 amPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:37 pmPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:48 pmI personally like the idea of of using the intake manifold mounted to the head and using the carb you are going to run to introduce the fluid. Just have the fluid resevoir mounted higher than the carb and then you do not need a pump. That would emmulate the way the carb introduces the fuel and the way the manifold affects the air flow. I know in my case when I mount the intake manifold the air flow smooths way out. Almost all the turbulence is gone. So IMNSHO (in my not so humble opinion ) I think that needs to be taken into account.
John
) I think that needs to be taken into account.John
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:52 ami agree that the manifold & carb have to be mounted in some instances air cleaner less filter if there are bends or somthing that directs the air movement in "bends" one direction or where your not pulling "still" air.
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:00 pmOtto & John
I'm with you guys on that thinking. Too many things can influence the distribution. I think simulating the setup you're intending to run is probably going to paint the best picture.
JMO
Larry C
I'm with you guys on that thinking. Too many things can influence the distribution. I think simulating the setup you're intending to run is probably going to paint the best picture.
JMO
Larry C
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:15 ami think it needs to be more of a "Total Induction Bench"
Definately use the intended carb and manifold to wet flow
Inline 4 and 6 cyl would be easy as the carb would sit in reasonable location as in situe..
V banked engines i think would probably have to have a 45deg or whatever angle head wedge plate ...... ... the anglling of the head on the wedge adapter would allow a better view of intake port as well on a bench without a back board.
Definately use the intended carb and manifold to wet flow
Inline 4 and 6 cyl would be easy as the carb would sit in reasonable location as in situe..
V banked engines i think would probably have to have a 45deg or whatever angle head wedge plate ...... ... the anglling of the head on the wedge adapter would allow a better view of intake port as well on a bench without a back board.
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:54 pmA wedge. Now that makes me wonder if the force of gravity (and from an accelerating car) comes into play or not of the fuel (water) in the airstream? Conventionally, the head (V8 especially) is mounted horizontally on a bench. And when an intake runner is added, that is horizontal. Will have to check if the head was tested at the true installed angle, would the mixture slighly change from the conventional. This is for viewing inside the runner only. But there may be a change in the chamber?? Maybe a little too much. But a little here and a little there adds up and the other guy scratching his head even more.
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 5:01 pmWhat is the proper method of introducing fluid into the port?[quote]
Thats something we all still have to find out, and Im sure we will.
Thats something we all still have to find out, and Im sure we will.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:33 pmPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:12 amon the g forces maybe standig head on end would be worth a shot just to see the effect and how much difference from wedged
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:07 amI have an idea! Let's put our flow benches in a centrifuge. :p Only trouble is I would up chuck on my heads.
John
John
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:35 pmThat's OK John. That stuff is the perfect consistency for evaluating wet flow. Not to mention, you dont have to build anything to introduce it into the airstream. :p