Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:25 amI think you'll be OK. If it were me, I'd make the baffle wider from the front view. 2 or 3 grid lines worth should suffice.
Edited By larrycavan on 1215517057
Tractorsport Flowbench Forum Archive
Archived Flow Bench Forum
http://www.tractorsport.com/forum/
Arrangement with limited space for a flowbench
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 5:25 amPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:36 amPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:24 am"some hours" end in two days, but at least I have played around with some setups:
I thought the overall sizes of the flow bench and the volumes of the chambers. I end up with changing the splitting the "C-Chamber" where the blowers are. Instead of splitting over the short side, I will split the box from left to right over the wide side. This allows me to put in 8 instead of 9 blower motors, but the overall wide shrinks from 100 cm to 80 cm and the blower champer does is not so hight and I win more space for the upper chambers. As a plus, I have both, the sucking and blowing opening at the left hand, which makes it easier for me to arrange the flow bench into the workshop.
First of all (Idea A) I rebuild the flow bench chamber A and B as it was before, but with more space:
However I tought about following variants:
Idea B:
(Just rearranged)
Idea B2:
(closed the upper opening of the baffle and moved the orifice place higher)
With this variation, I hope the measuring is a bit more stable, as the air flow does have more space to settle and is not "hitting hard" to the wall of baffle.
What do you guys think ?
Cheers,
Daniel
I thought the overall sizes of the flow bench and the volumes of the chambers. I end up with changing the splitting the "C-Chamber" where the blowers are. Instead of splitting over the short side, I will split the box from left to right over the wide side. This allows me to put in 8 instead of 9 blower motors, but the overall wide shrinks from 100 cm to 80 cm and the blower champer does is not so hight and I win more space for the upper chambers. As a plus, I have both, the sucking and blowing opening at the left hand, which makes it easier for me to arrange the flow bench into the workshop.
First of all (Idea A) I rebuild the flow bench chamber A and B as it was before, but with more space:
However I tought about following variants:
Idea B:
(Just rearranged)
Idea B2:
(closed the upper opening of the baffle and moved the orifice place higher)
With this variation, I hope the measuring is a bit more stable, as the air flow does have more space to settle and is not "hitting hard" to the wall of baffle.
What do you guys think ?
Cheers,
Daniel
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:29 amSomething that has been discussed before is; you need the airflow to hit the orifice plate all around and not from one or two sides alone.
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 4:38 am